WEAKNESSES OF THE PROPOSED REHABILITATION OF THE VILLAGE OF Faisanderie. At the meeting last May 27 between the DPOs of Fontainebleau and the inhabitants of the bars of the Pheasant, everyone could voice his opinion on various topics.
, architects who want creative, but not always functional, have noted the grievances of the people experiencing problems in years of discomfort and insecurity in those buildings. On
the interior apartments, it was not planned pantry, cellar or room for bicycles and strollers, to ensure that people use their balconies as storage. In addition, some apartments originally equipped with a "good room" that can be used for storage, will have more enjoyment because of the extra room will be removed during the repair of bearings.
As for the outdoor, facades retain their current appearance more clean and the balconies will be renovated and will retain its appearance reflected the mesh leaving various objects and various accumulated lack of space.
We therefore hoped that the architects reconsider the problem of pantry or cellar for each apartment, and they offer a cover for balconies, see another model in order to guard the privacy of tenants and aesthetics of the area.
We are still somewhat disappointed by the desire to preserve the original appearance fronts as new technologies offer alternatives more attractive and without damaging the building. Thus, some residents had expressed the idea of a green wall covering flint, like Branly Museum Paris, which is in perfect harmony with the forest that surrounds these buildings ... And we're still waiting for proposals covering the fireplace located on the bar "Canada", because after its compliance with standards that should be done for school, we are concerned about his final appearance to hide the "pipeline" before our eyes now!
As for the distribution of housing in particular, the presence of shops on the ground floor bar "Great Britain" and "Canada", residents have expressed reservations about the type of businesses allowed. It was clearly understood that they wanted in any case flow drinks or fast food for obvious reasons of nuisance with proximity to schools. Among the various proposals, it was hoped the presence of a pharmacy, a press office service and a launderette (very useful for residents and student housing) ... Moreover, the idea of creating a nursery does not unanimous because the installation of the school "Le Roseau" proved that coexistence between houses and a school was not compatible.
As for parking, we liked the idea of two underground garages in order to limit the presence cars surface, but we find that 380 parking spaces for 358 dwellings will not insofar as the average of two vehicles per household. Besides, the parking problem "wild" at the foot of the bars was again discussed and the people wanted a system that privatized the field (gates, bollards ...). On the other hand, the presence of a keeper staff housing on site, was asked to monitor the premises and the maintenance of common areas that are often cleaned by the tenants themselves ...
Finally, the major concern of the current tenants of the bars is their removal and rising rents. Mr. Videau said that moving costs would be borne by the DPOs and a redistribution of housing would in most logical namely a distribution of areas based on actual needs of each family. Thus, everyone can claim a larger home or smaller with a suitable rent. However, it is not possible to consider a second move to return to his old apartment ... Mr. Videau said a study on a "case by case" would be to meet the tenants and we want strongly to meet its responsibilities.
